279
279
Interpretation of evidence to accused or his pleader
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Chapter XXIII Evidence in Inquiries and Trials
⚖️
Reviewed by Advocate Aditi Babbar, Seasoned Advocate · Practicing since 31 yearsCourt ProcedureEvidenceInterpretationFair Trial
🗣️ Simple Explanation
What does this law say?
Section 279 of the CrPC says that if the accused doesn't understand the language used in court, the evidence must be interpreted for them. This is done in a language they understand. If the accused has a lawyer, and the lawyer doesn't understand the language, the evidence is interpreted for the lawyer.
Why does this law exist?
It ensures the accused understands the charges against them. It makes sure they can defend themselves properly. It protects their right to a fair trial.
Real-life impact
This law helps people who don't speak the court's language. It ensures they understand the evidence. It allows them to participate in their defense. It helps in a fair legal process.
What happens if you break this law?
This section itself doesn't describe breaking a law. It's about interpreting evidence. If the rules aren't followed, it could lead to the trial being unfair. This could lead to an appeal.
💡 Real Life Example
Amit is accused of a crime. The witnesses speak English. Amit only speaks Hindi. The court provides an interpreter. Amit understands the evidence. This ensures a fair trial.
Sneha's lawyer doesn't understand Tamil. The witnesses speak Tamil. The court provides an interpreter for the lawyer. This ensures the lawyer can defend Sneha properly. This helps in a fair trial.
🛡️ KNOW YOUR RIGHTS
- •Know that you have the right to an interpreter.
- •Ensure you understand the evidence presented in court.
- •Ask for an interpreter if you don't understand the language.
- •Understand that your lawyer will also have an interpreter if needed.
❓ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Section 279 of the CrPC says that if the accused doesn't understand the language used in court, the evidence must be interpreted for them. This is done in a language they understand. If the accused has a lawyer, and the lawyer doesn't understand the language, the evidence is interpreted for the lawyer. This ensures fairness.
If the court doesn't follow Section 279, it could lead to an unfair trial. The accused might not understand the evidence. They might not be able to defend themselves properly. This could lead to the trial being challenged. It could also lead to an appeal. The goal is to ensure fairness.
Sources & References
📒 Legal text sourced from The Gazette of India & AdvocateKhoj Bare Acts Library
⚖️ Content reviewed by Advocate Aditi Babbar, Seasoned Advocate, with 31 years of legal practice
📚 Act Reference: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for specific legal matters.
Was this helpful?