278
278
Procedure in regard to such evidence when completed
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Chapter XXIII Evidence in Inquiries and Trials
⚖️
Reviewed by Advocate Aditi Babbar, Seasoned Advocate · Practicing since 31 yearsCourt ProcedureEvidenceWitnessFair Trial
🗣️ Simple Explanation
What does this law say?
Section 278 of the CrPC explains what happens after a witness's evidence is recorded. The evidence is read back to the witness. The accused or their lawyer is present. If there are mistakes, they are corrected. If the witness disagrees, the judge notes the objection.
Why does this law exist?
It ensures the accuracy of the evidence. It gives the witness a chance to correct mistakes. It protects the rights of the accused. It helps in a fair trial.
Real-life impact
This law helps to make sure the evidence is correct. It allows the witness to confirm what they said. It helps to prevent misunderstandings. It ensures a fair legal process.
What happens if you break this law?
This section itself doesn't describe breaking a law. It's about the procedure of reading back evidence. If the rules aren't followed, it could lead to the trial being unfair. This could lead to an appeal.
💡 Real Life Example
Rahul is accused of a crime. After a witness testifies, the evidence is read back. Rahul and his lawyer are present. The witness confirms the statement. This ensures accuracy.
Priya is a witness. Her statement is read back to her. She finds a mistake. The judge corrects it. This ensures the record is accurate. This helps in a fair trial.
🛡️ KNOW YOUR RIGHTS
- •Know that your statement will be read back to you.
- •Have the right to correct any mistakes in your statement.
- •Ensure you understand the evidence presented in court.
- •Ask for clarification if you don't understand the language used.
❓ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Section 278 of the CrPC explains what happens after a witness's evidence is recorded. The evidence is read back to the witness in the presence of the accused or their lawyer. If there are mistakes, they are corrected. If the witness disagrees, the judge notes the objection. This ensures accuracy.
If the court doesn't follow Section 278, it could lead to an unfair trial. The witness might not be able to correct mistakes. The accused might not be present. This could lead to the trial being challenged. It could also lead to an appeal. The goal is to ensure accuracy and fairness.
Sources & References
📒 Legal text sourced from The Gazette of India & AdvocateKhoj Bare Acts Library
⚖️ Content reviewed by Advocate Aditi Babbar, Seasoned Advocate, with 31 years of legal practice
📚 Act Reference: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for specific legal matters.
Was this helpful?